In the care of the Meeting? - preview
Laurie Michaelis suggests that we have a duty of care to Friends who are not in steady relationships
I rejoice in Yearly Meeting’s decision about same-sex marriages And I am glad that Yearly Meeting achieved such a quality of community, spiritual discernment, mutual sensitivity and support Of course, each step towards greater equality and inclusion – towards a more conscious life in the Spirit – brings into relief other areas where consciousness has still to develop
During Yearly Meeting many of us were concerned that the focus on the marriage process could be painful for Friends for whom committed relationship seems unavailable It was a relief when Harvey Gillman gave voice to this concern in ministry But are we idealising a traditional form of relationship that simply does not work for many people? Testimonies ‘to the grace of God as shown in the life of’ deceased Friends often speak of model marriages and welcoming homes Messier paths are treated more as a cause for sympathy than celebration
Laurie Michaelis
This is a preview of the full article - to see the whole thing, or to post a comment you need to login, or alternatively you could try a free sample!
Comments:
chrissie hinde, 27 August
I love what you write here. Like you I was really moved by Yearly Meeting’s decision about same-sex marriages. but I'm also uncomfortable about the way society sees marriage as a 'gold standard'. When Dolly Parton was asked (a long while back) whether Gay people should be allowed to marry, she replied: "Hell yes! why shouldn't they suffer like the rest of us!' I love her response because it sums up what I think. Yes let's have equality for same sex couples, but lets also be real about coupledom not being some kind of elevated, greater state of being. I've always found being part of a couple a tough challenge, and think marriages are no more divine than for example a chance meeting at a bus stop with a stranger where you fine yourself having a wonderful moment of connection. Spontaneous and unexpected. I admire people who chose to be single, despite huge pressures to pair off. I can't think of anything more suffocating than a society where everyone is in a couple!
|
|
|
In this week's
online edition...
cover
US Quaker lobbyists ‘say it with flowers’
Oliver Robertson Campaigners disappointed by lack of progress over UK arms export rules
The spiritual side of gardens
Oliver Robertson News round-up
In the care of the Meeting?
Laurie Michaelis Lockerbie grief and justice
Julia Cadman The centrality of worship
George Baines Letters
Leaving Quakers…
Sarah Pearce … beginning a journey with Friends
Helen Smith Good Lourdes
Matthew Biggs The pulse of God’s blood in our veins
Gerard Benson Tricks, treats and choices
Alison Leonard Tackling climate change together
Gerald Conyngham A sideways glance at Yearly Meeting
Joe Thwaites
q-eye
eye@thefriend.org
Advertisements
Things to do, where to stay, people to see etc...
download
this issue
save
this page
|
most recent comments:
Letters, Ala
Quaker approach to business under the spotlight, David Hitchin
Tackling the pay gap from both ends, anonymous poster
Some more equal than others?, anonymous poster
Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
The centrality of worship, Andrew Hatton, Maldon LM, Essex
In the care of the Meeting?, chrissie hinde
Lockerbie grief and justice, Jennifer Barraclough
The centrality of worship, Peter Arnold
The top ten reasons (plus three) why bottled water is a blessing, Fee Berry
Letters, David Hitchin
Marriage and committed relationships, Fee Berry
George Fox and same gender partnership, Chris Bagley
Marriage and committed relationships, Chris Bagley
Meeting for meditation?, Barry
Meeting for ‘weorthscipe’?, Gerard Guiton
Report shows that all is not well in multicultural Britain, chrissie hinde
Johann Sebastian Bach and the Jews, Peter Arnold
Prisons: our growth industry, Peer Arnold
|
Save on your phone bills with:
|
|