the friend online
11 April 2008

Britain Yearly Meeting

Meeting for Sufferings - round-up - preview
No 'sat-navs' for us, we're Quakers!
Long-term Framework makes it through Sufferings with minor but significant changes

It arrived at Saturday's Meeting for Sufferings facing an expected storm, but Friends debating the Long-term Framework progress report pulled unity from disunity to send the radical document to Yearly Meeting


  • The Long-term Framework (LTF) Group had identified seven priorities for Quaker work over the next six years: strengthening the spiritual roots in our Meetings and ourselves; speaking out in the world; peace; sustainability and the environment; being a welcoming community to migrants; criminal justice; and using our resources well
  • The document envisaged radical changes in our ways of working, with better networking inside and outside the Society
  • The Group's convener Margaret Peacock told Friends: 'Our remit was to find the visions and priorities of the Society as a whole
  • We read everything we received and from it produced the framework document you have before you
  • '

    Oliver Robertson

    This is a preview of the full article - to see the whole thing, or to post a comment you need to login, or alternatively you could try a free sample!

    Comments:

    Peter Kennedy, 13 April
    As a member of both Meeting for Sufferings and the QPSW Grants Group I am disappointed that your reporter omitted to mention concerns raised at the recent Sufferings about the QPSW Relief Grants scheme. Much time and considerable thought has been devoted to this matter over the past few months and it is unfortunate that the report failed to provide any satisfactory closure on the matter.

    Truth is many sided and, as Quakers we should never be afraid to justify our actions and decisions, or to be transparent and held open to scrutiny. A decision was made in autumn 2007 that grants from the QPSW Relief Grants scheme should be limited to £6,000 per annum per application. This amount might not suit some people, for any number of reasons, but it was a decision of the group charged with distributing the funds, it was made in good faith, and as such it should be respected.

    Although, somewhere in the region of £32,000 will be distributed this year, since some applicants may come back for a second and third year of funding, along with new applications it is possible that subsequent years might see this amount substantially increase. Spending at some 2-3 times this year's amount would see the £400,000+ capital fund released in a relatively short time.

    These grants were advertised as being specifically for the relief of people who are suffering as a result of natural disasters, climate change, war or conflict, but not for immediate crisis relief; the projects should be time limited, or at least able to become financially sustainable by the end of the funding. Some of the applications received scored poorly on these criteria in that they could have become an open-ended commitment.

    QPSW Grants Group have a responsibility to ensure that the Relief Funds are used in the manner for which they were intended. They also have a duty to ensure that those receiving grants have fulfilled certain criteria.

    I note that Sufferings minuted it was happy to uphold the groups and committees which work on behalf of Britain Yearly Meeting.

    This thread was orignally submitted as a letter - but apparently is too long for that. Or is it that any letter pointing out a failure to report openly and honestly can only be published once it has been edited so its whole sense has been lost?!?



  •  


    This week's .pdf
    In this week's online edition... rss edition
    cover

    News round-up
    news@thefriend.org
    Meeting for Sufferings - round-up
    Oliver Robertson
    Our unique evolutionary path
    Terry Wood
    Comment
    Roger Hill & Janet Quilley
    Letters
    editorial@thefriend.org
    Behind the Spanish Barricades
    Debbie Langdon-Davies
    Reviews

    The spirituality of running
    Tim Hather
    q-eye
    eye@thefriend.org

    Advertisements
    Things to do, where to stay, people to see etc...

    download this issue

    save this page

    most recent comments:
    Letters, Ala
    Quaker approach to business under the spotlight, David Hitchin
    Tackling the pay gap from both ends, anonymous poster
    Some more equal than others?, anonymous poster
    Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
    Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
    The centrality of worship, Andrew Hatton, Maldon LM, Essex
    In the care of the Meeting?, chrissie hinde
    Lockerbie grief and justice, Jennifer Barraclough
    The centrality of worship, Peter Arnold
    The top ten reasons (plus three) why bottled water is a blessing, Fee Berry
    Letters, David Hitchin
    Marriage and committed relationships, Fee Berry
    George Fox and same gender partnership, Chris Bagley
    Marriage and committed relationships, Chris Bagley
    Meeting for meditation?, Barry
    Meeting for ‘weorthscipe’?, Gerard Guiton
    Report shows that all is not well in multicultural Britain, chrissie hinde
    Johann Sebastian Bach and the Jews, Peter Arnold
    Prisons: our growth industry, Peer Arnold

    Save on your phone bills with:
    the phone co-op - your voice counts