the friend online
12 October 2007


Comment - preview
Called to be peacemakers
I had the privilege of attending a meeting in New York with president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran
  • The gathering was requested by president Ahmadinejad and organized by the Mennonite Central Committee
  • It was endorsed by the American Friends Service Committee, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, the Mennonite Church, the Church of the Brethren General Board, et al
  • It seemed to many of us to be a very satisfactory meeting and I came away refreshed in our call to be peacemakers

  • Arthur Larrabee & Alan Sealy

    This is a preview of the full article - to see the whole thing, or to post a comment you need to login, or alternatively you could try a free sample!


    Stephen Petter, 10 October
    Like Alan Sealy I was troubled by David Boulton's portrayal of Quakerism in The Guardian. Not so much by his mention of flatulence as by his description: "There are biblical and secular Quakers, Jewish and pagan Quakers, born-again Quakers and Quaker agnostics and humanists." He goes on to say this is a problem only "to those who stubbornly insist that they alone know the way, the truth, and the life." I consider the latter to be a very unfair characterisation those who do not accept that, for instance, one can be a Quaker humanist, or, as I believe David Boulton champions, a non-theistic Quaker. I am very happy with the reality of Jewish, pagan, Hindu, etc etc Quakers. I do not stubbornly insist etc but I do accept that Quakerism involves commitment to a way of worship that allows God to teach and transform us. And that our practice (which I do not claim is the only way, truth or life) is to *trust* (a verb which implies the possibility of being mistaken) that the promptings of love and truth in our hearts are the leadings of God. I do not think Quakers need believe what I believe but I do think it reasonable to assume that anyone joining a religious society is religious, or at least is willing to become so, and that if I join a society for whatever, be it darts or debating, I will encounter others who engage in the stated practice. I certainly would not expect to find darts-deniers in a darts society and bigots in a debating society, even if, like David Boulton, they are very pleasant people. I think we have a problem which so far we have not faced up to, similar to that of the Labour Party when Militant Tendency tried to take it over. Who will be our Kinnock?


    This week's .pdf
    In this week's online edition... rss edition

    News round-up
    Was I right to become a Quaker?
    Toni Berry
    Arthur Larrabee & Alan Sealy
    20th century Friends
    Simon Risley
    Star House
    Margaret Crompton
    Kingdom Practice
    Simon Latham
    Abolish torture! What can Friends do?
    Caroline Lane

    Things to do, where to stay, people to see etc...

    download this issue

    save this page

    most recent comments:
    Letters, Ala
    Quaker approach to business under the spotlight, David Hitchin
    Tackling the pay gap from both ends, anonymous poster
    Some more equal than others?, anonymous poster
    Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
    Climate Camp experience, Frances Laing
    The centrality of worship, Andrew Hatton, Maldon LM, Essex
    In the care of the Meeting?, chrissie hinde
    Lockerbie grief and justice, Jennifer Barraclough
    The centrality of worship, Peter Arnold
    The top ten reasons (plus three) why bottled water is a blessing, Fee Berry
    Letters, David Hitchin
    Marriage and committed relationships, Fee Berry
    George Fox and same gender partnership, Chris Bagley
    Marriage and committed relationships, Chris Bagley
    Meeting for meditation?, Barry
    Meeting for ‘weorthscipe’?, Gerard Guiton
    Report shows that all is not well in multicultural Britain, chrissie hinde
    Johann Sebastian Bach and the Jews, Peter Arnold
    Prisons: our growth industry, Peer Arnold

    Save on your phone bills with:
    the phone co-op - your voice counts